[SCC_Active_Members] Do you remember SUPPAK (360
assembler/simulator running on 7094)?
Paul McJones
paul at mcjones.org
Tue Aug 1 20:06:44 PDT 2006
Rich Cornwell, who has written one of the most detailed 704/709/709x
simulators and who is systematically working out how to run the various
surviving software packages for those machines, is currently
reverse-engineering SUPPAK, a cross-development package for developing
System/360 software on the 7094. He would like to hear from anyone who ...
... might have used SUPPAK how jobs were structured. I've been
trying to build a test job. I have figured out that there must be
either a S or $ in col 1, ACTIO or TITLE in col 6, and SIMULA or
ASSEMBL following with options. But I can't get it to see my 360 asm
code as asm, it keeps thinking it is remarks. From some research I
have been doing, it looks like it might have simulated PCP for
SVC's but not sure.
SUPPAK is only one of the interesting items Rich has run across recently:
But on a whim I decided too look at adc00112.bcd that I got off
Pierce's web site a while ago. After poking around with it I tried
to list it with my disassembler. PAY DIRT BIG TIME. Tape is a Yale
IBSYS systems tape! On it I found following goodies:
TEXT90 - Some sort of early runoff I think.
OMNITAB - Early release of MINITAB!
IPL-V - Text processing language.
SUPPAK - IBM360 asm/sim
USER - Not sure what it does.
PRECISE - Again not sure what it does.
MAMOS/JSYS - Yales interal OS!
MAD - Mad compiler
MADTRN - I believe Fortan to Mad translator
SNOBOL - Snobol system! (not sure yet if it is 3 or 4). Dated 66.
ALCOR - Algol compiler for 7090.
Also full set of standard utilities. More changes to extract patches.
Unfortunatly the tape is blocked and I need to figure out how to unblock
it to boot it. When I get it bootable I will put it on my site. I
will also
work on disassembling the other programs like I did with Suppak so
we can
better understand how they worked. ...
So if anyone has information on SUPPAK (or an interest in getting these
other programs running), please reply directly to Rich and/or me. Thanks!
Paul
More information about the SCC_active
mailing list